AConfigureCheapest
Branch the existing retry rule on failure type
+Reuses the rule and the captured failure codes.
−Only as good as the codes the gateway sends.
Track C · In development
ROQIVA · Revenue Operations, Quality, Intelligence & Value Architecture
ROQIVA is an integrated revenue orchestration product in development, designed to work within your existing client-controlled architecture alongside CRM, analytics, payments and operations tools. It connects signals, governed agent workflows and decisions in one system.
Planned architecture · by design
Parts
Gates on every work item
Gate 1AuditBrand PMconfirms the problem is real and worth fixingGate 2DecidePM and leadspick the solutionGate 3BuildPM, designer and engineerapprove the packGate 4ReleaseBrand approversigns one exact release candidate, and the brand shipsReviewMeasurePM and analytics ownerreview the verdictGates 2 and 3 may merge for a small change. Gates 1 and 4 are never skipped.
The workspace
An interactive concept walkthrough using sample data. Navigate signals, findings, the Brain log and agent views to explore how ROQIVA is designed to work.
Audit last quarter’s exports. What do we capture that no decision reads?
Code matched 6 signals to the decisions that read them. 4 have no decision that reads them. F-001 ranks first: Payments → CRM retry rule.
Read Payments export, CRM retry-rule configuration
Ranked 6 findings by value × confidence ÷ effort
Waiting for Gate 1 · Brand PM
Describe a revenue problem or ask the Brain
Read-onlyAnalystGate 1
Inside ROQIVA
Brain, Detectors/Analyst, Orchestrator, drafting agents and Monitor are software capabilities. People approve decisions; your existing commercial tools remain external. Pick a part to explore.
One work item
Any gate can send the item back one step, with a reason the Brain keeps. Gates 2 and 3 may merge for a small change. Gates 1 and 4 are never skipped.
Step 01 · Detectors
Detectors match every captured signal to the decision that reads it and flag the gaps. Code does the matching. No agent is involved, and no one needs to approve a log entry.
No gate. The signal is logged.
Detectors · Pack 1 · run on exportsCode
payments.failure_codePaymentsCRM retry ruleGaporders.statusOrdersCustomer messagesReadsearch.zero_result_termSearch logRange planningGapcustomer.idAppCRM audiencesReadstorefront.notify_meStorefrontRestock messagesGaporders.courier_delayOrdersCustomer messagesGap4 of 6 signals have no decision that reads them. Code matched every signal to the decision that reads it. No agent is involved.
Step 02 · Analyst
The Analyst reads the flagged gap, writes what should happen and what does happen, checks the evidence, labels it Confirmed, Supported or Hypothesis, sizes the value as a range and ranks it. Gate 1 opens the work item.
Gate 1 · Brand PM confirms the problem is real and worth fixing
F-001Failed payments get one retryPayments → CRM retry rule9F-002Zero-result searches never reviewedSearch log → range planning3F-004Courier delay events unusedOrders → customer messages3F-003Notify-me sign-ups never readStorefront → restock messages2F-006City stock shown as one national totalInventory → product page1.5F-005COD rule with no refusal historyOrders → COD eligibility1Score = value × confidence ÷ effort. Sample values, not measurements.
Step 03 · Research, Architect, Product
Research brings outside evidence. Architect checks what can be reused and what could clash. Product drafts two or three solutions with trade-offs, including the cheapest one. They run in parallel, and people choose.
Gate 2 · PM and leads pick the solution
AConfigureCheapest
+Reuses the rule and the captured failure codes.
−Only as good as the codes the gateway sends.
BBuild
+Full control over timing and channels.
−The longest path to ship.
CRun manually
+No engineering needed.
−Does not scale past a few cases.
Evidence: Supported. People choose at Gate 2.
Step 04 · Product, Design, Architect, QA
Product writes the requirements and the PRD draft. Design turns them into a reviewable prototype. Architect draws the system design. QA drafts the checks. Gate 3 releases the handoff pack: PRD, wireframe, tickets, test checklist and sources.
Gate 3 · PM, designer and engineer approve the pack
The CRM retry rule treats hard, transient and bank-side failures the same. Gateway failure codes are captured and never read.
Retry each failure type the way it should be retried, and leave unrecoverable failures alone.
R1Capture the failure class on every failed payment attempt.R2Retry transient failures once, after a short delay. Never retry a hard decline.R3Show an error state with a next action for hard and transient failures.Show an error state with a next action for hard, transient and bank-side failures. ChangedYour PMCommentResolved
Bank-side failures have no error state. Add one.
Comment
R4Send retry_attempted and retry_result with the failure class.retry_attemptedA retry startsretry_resultA retry endsfailure_classOn the order eventOpen Card-network decline reasons were not in the export. Who owns them?
Step 05 · Brand engineers, QA
The brand’s engineers build and deploy. The system never writes to their tools. QA reports passed, failed and not tested. The measurement plan is agreed before release.
Gate 4 · Brand approver signs one exact release candidate, and the brand ships
2 passed · 1 failed · 2 not tested3 passed · 0 failed · 2 not testedRelease blockedReady to sign
Rollback rule agreed before release: pause the branch if duplicate charges appear.
A failure blocks release. Not tested is never reported as passed.
Step 06 · Monitor
The Monitor checks the release against its spec, catches unplanned changes and measures the result against a baseline. The verdict and the reason go back to the Brain.
Outcome review · PM and analytics owner
The verdict and its reason go back to the Brain. An inconclusive result is reported as inconclusive.
The principle
Code counts. An agent drafts. A named person decides anything that changes the business.
codeCode computes.
agentAgents draft.
personPeople decide.
Your accounts
ROQIVA is being designed for deployment within approved client infrastructure, with controlled access to existing commercial tools. Final data flows, integration boundaries and operating responsibilities depend on the chosen architecture.
Outside your cloud
MESHHETU
Inside your cloud
ROQIVA
Stays yours
Data and prompts stay in the brand’s accounts, so residency and inference consent are the brand’s own decisions.
The brand pins releases. An upgrade passes the eval gate before the brand takes it.
The brand’s team is first-line support and MESHHETU is second line.
The brand’s security review replaces the hosted data terms.
Two ways to get there
These are prospective integration and deployment approaches, not production-ready options. Final scope is subject to product development and security review.
A proposed custom implementation following an agreed blueprint and client engineering plan
A planned packaged ROQIVA deployment inside approved client infrastructure
What holds, always
01
02
03
04
05
ROQIVA
Discuss the product roadmap and how a future ROQIVA deployment might fit your architecture. Strategic consulting and modular intelligence are available from MESHHETU today.