# Services — MESHHETU Source: https://meshhetu.com/services Last updated: 2026-10-16 Services # Three ways to engineer better revenue systems. Get strategic consulting, targeted systems intelligence or explore the integrated ROQIVA product being developed for your architecture. Tracks A and B are available today; ROQIVA is not yet production-ready. Choose a track 3 ways to buy A Strategic Consulting B Modular Systems Intelligence C ROQIVA Available today Ready · Now Get expert help with your commercial and revenue systems Who runs it The brand gets Audit, research briefs, strategy, PRDs, delivery governance Audit research briefs strategy PRDs delivery governance Available today Ready · Now · scoped to your needs Add focused intelligence without rebuilding your stack Who runs it The brand gets Scoped Brain, Analyst and Monitor capabilities Scoped Brain Analyst and Monitor capabilities In development Ready · In development · not production-ready Explore a complete orchestration layer for your existing stack Who runs it The brand gets The full system end to end The full system end to end On this page - Compare - A · Consulting - B · Intelligence - C · ROQIVA Find your fit ## Choose an engagement that matches your need. One approach, three distinct engagements: consulting and modular intelligence available now; integrated ROQIVA in development. Consulting and modular intelligence are available now; ROQIVA is in development Track A · Consulting Track B · Modular intelligence Track C · ROQIVA What you buy Strategic consulting and agreed deliverables Focused modular intelligence, with limited integration An integrated orchestration product being developed Delivery MESHHETU-led strategic work; no system purchase MESHHETU configures and operates the scoped modules Designed to run within the client architecture You receive Audits, strategy, specifications and governance as scoped Context, findings and monitoring/review outputs as scoped The planned end-to-end ROQIVA platform Availability Available now Available now In development; not production-ready Track A · Strategic Consulting · Available now ## Bring strategic expertise to your commercial challenges. Available today Ready · Now Strategic consulting for commercial, growth and product systems. We investigate the root cause, recommend interventions, develop strategy and execution-ready requirements, and govern delivery where scoped. Your team retains implementation and release ownership. What you receive: Audit, research briefs, strategy, PRDs, delivery governance. Track A · one engagement Phase 0 of 7 0 Qualify 1 Discover 2 Audit 3 Strategy 4 Specify 5 Govern delivery 6 Verify and measure 7 Close or continue Goal Confirm the engagement is a fit Founders write Scope note Check the tools in scope, data availability and who decides. You decide Exit check Conditions to start are met. Your team Name approvers. Handed over Scope note Track A · consulting deliverables and working details 9 sections The offer Choose the consulting deliverables you need Understand our delivery responsibilities See the methods supporting our work Continue with ongoing strategic advisory How it runs Explore the detailed consulting process Agree how we work together Guardrails Prepare for the consulting engagement Review our consulting safeguards See how scope and blockers are handled ### Choose the consulting deliverables you need Commission an individual consulting service or combine several into a scoped engagement. Deliverables and timelines are agreed in advance. Choose the consulting deliverables you need Shape Output Ends at 1 · Decision audit Decision register, ranked findings with evidence labels, coverage and value ranges, data gaps, a readout Gate 1 2 · Research brief A dated brief: competitor benchmark, news and market scan, recall of past tests The requester accepts 3 · Strategy and PRDs A roadmap of CRO initiatives, gaps and an instrumentation plan, then PRDs and a project plan Gate 3 4 · Governed delivery A delivery run to release, tracking verified, an outcome review Outcome review 5 · Retainer Continuous signal-to-decision review with a monthly founder review Monthly review ### Understand our delivery responsibilities Understand our delivery responsibilities In scope Out of scope The audit and the decision register Configuring or changing the brand’s tools Research and benchmarking Design work and prototypes Strategy: CRO initiatives, gaps, instrumentation Engineering and QA PRDs, tracking spec, acceptance criteria Running campaigns or replacing the brand’s tools Project planning and deliverable management Production release Tracking verification and the outcome review Guaranteeing an outcome ### See the methods supporting our work See the methods supporting our work Tool What it does Ready Analyst Gap findings on exports against the decision register. MVP step 1. A Claude project until then. Research Briefs in two modes: internal recall and external scan. A Claude project with web search. Product PRD drafts and metric proposals inside the template. A Claude project with the template. None is sold on its own. A founder reviews every output before a client sees it. ### Continue with ongoing strategic advisory Continue beyond the initial engagement with opportunity reviews, prioritization support and delivery governance. A separate Track B scope can provide recurring systems intelligence when useful. ### Explore the detailed consulting process 0 Qualify 1 Discover 2 Audit Gate 1 3 Strategy Gate 2 4 Specify Gate 3 5 Govern delivery 6 Verify and measure 7 Close or continue Phase 0 · Qualify Confirm the engagement is a fit What we do Check the tools in scope, data availability and who decides. Write the scope note. What you do Name approvers. Confirm the data access route. Produces Scope note: questions, tools in scope, shapes bought Exit check Conditions to start are met Phase 1 · Discover Understand the business and collect the data What we do Interview owners. Collect exports and configuration. Build the context file and the coverage map. What you do Give access. Join interviews. Confirm what each rule means. Produces Context file (eight sections) and coverage map Exit check Owners confirm the context. Coverage is accepted Phase 2 · Audit Find where captured signals fail to reach decisions What we do Build the decision register. Run the Analyst. Verify every finding, label its evidence and size its value. What you do Answer rule questions within the agreed window. Produces Decision register, finding cards, readout Exit check Gate 1: the client chooses which findings to pursue Phase 3 · Strategy Decide what to do about the chosen findings What we do Write options with trade-offs, CRO initiatives and an instrumentation plan. Commission research briefs where useful. What you do Review the options. Choose a direction. Produces Strategy roadmap with effort and value ranges Exit check Gate 2: the client chooses a direction Phase 4 · Specify Turn the direction into buildable work What we do Write PRDs with metrics, acceptance criteria and a tracking spec. Build the project plan and tickets. What you do Review the PRDs. Assign owners. Commit capacity. Produces Handoff pack Exit check Gate 3: the client approves the pack Phase 5 · Govern delivery Keep the brand’s build on plan What we do Run the weekly review. Keep the deliverable tracker, change log and risk log. Answer build questions. What you do Design, build, test and release. Produces Weekly status, change log Exit check A release candidate is ready on the brand’s side Phase 6 · Verify and measure Prove tracking works and read the result What we do Agree the measurement plan and freeze the baseline before release. Check tracking in staging and after release. Run the outcome review. What you do Release. Supply the data. Produces Verification note, outcome review Exit check The client accepts the verdict Phase 7 · Close or continue Hand over and decide what next What we do Write the close-out report. Hand over the context file and artifacts. Propose the retainer. What you do Decide on the retainer. Produces Close-out pack Exit check The client signs off or renews ### Agree how we work together The founders consult part-time, so work runs asynchronously with fixed weekly touchpoints. Agree how we work together Touchpoint When Purpose Kickoff Start of phase 1 Confirm scope, owners and the data plan Weekly review Every week from phase 1 Progress, blockers, decisions needed, change log Gate call At Gates 1, 2 and 3 A recorded client decision Outcome review After the agreed outcome window Verdict, limits and next action Monthly review During a retainer Findings, dismissals, coverage and change notices ### Prepare for the consulting engagement - Exports and configuration for the tools in scope. - An owner who can explain the rules in each tool. - Named approvers for each gate. - Signed data terms. - A delivery owner on the brand’s side. ### Review our consulting safeguards - One artifact set across all tracks: the same templates, IDs, evidence labels and gate records as the full system. - Log founder hours, model spend, edits and gate outcomes on every case. They become the examples each agent is judged against. - Automate a step only when it has repeated across cases with the same shape and its manual time is a measurable cost. - The founders do not build, design or test for the brand. - Each phase ends with a written exit check before the next begins. - Access is read-only. The founders never change a brand’s systems. - A finding the brand has not confirmed is labelled a hypothesis, and every finding states its limits. ### See how scope and blockers are handled What happens when plans slip If this happens Then Data is not provided by the agreed date The engagement pauses. Scope narrows to the sources received, and findings are labelled limited coverage. Use of a signal cannot be proven Reported as a coverage gap that names the missing source. Never a finding. The client cannot decide at a gate Logged as deferred with the evidence kept. The clock stops. A finding changes after approval The affected gates reopen. The others stay. The brand team slips Logged as a risk with options: re-scope, defer or add capacity. The founders do not build. The client asks the founders to execute Handled as a separate scope with explicit agreement, or declined. The outcome is inconclusive Reported as inconclusive with its limit. No claim is made. [Discuss a consulting engagement](https://meshhetu.com/contact#brief) Track B · Modular Systems Intelligence · Available now ## Add focused intelligence without replacing your tools. Available today Ready · Now · scoped to your needs Focused intelligence and monitoring that MESHHETU can deliver now using approved data inputs and minimal system intervention. Brain, Analyst and Monitor describe the modular capabilities; the exact sources, cadence, automation and outputs are agreed in scope. Your team makes business decisions and ships fixes. What you receive: Scoped Brain, Analyst and Monitor capabilities. Track B · hosted modules One tenant per brand Sources · read-only Interviews Approved files Exports and configured sources where agreed Hosted by MESHHETU Founder review before anything reaches you Analyst Finding cards Monitor Alerts and release checks Brain Versioned context, the register, a coverage view, a context pack export Output Findings inbox F-001 Failed payments get one retry Sheets and Slack export Alerts No queue A source goes stale Output stops here Your team or the Track A founders plan and ship the fix 1 2 3 4 5 - Sources are read, never written to. The Brain holds the brand’s context. Track B · modular scope and operating details 10 sections The offer Explore three modular capabilities Scope the capability and operating cadence Why focus on three modules? How it runs See how modular engagements operate Understand the findings review process Agree a useful review cadence Measure the intelligence that matters Guardrails Prepare the approved inputs Hold to six working rules See how reliability and limits are handled ### Explore three modular capabilities Explore three modular capabilities Module Job Reads Produces Sold as Needs Brain Organizes business context, rules, source coverage and decisions in scope Interviews, approved files, exports and configured sources where agreed Versioned context, the register, a coverage view, a context pack export The setup, and the audit output Nothing Analyst Supports evidence-backed diagnosis of gaps between signals and decisions Brain, signals Finding cards with evidence label, coverage and value range A subscription Brain Monitor Supports scoped checks, tracking reviews and monitoring where configured Brain definitions, signals Alerts, intake cases, release verification A subscription add-on Brain. The Analyst for its diagnose tier ### Scope the capability and operating cadence Scope the capability and operating cadence Package Includes Recurring Audit The Brain populated, the decision register, first findings. A Track A project No Analyst Context and findings reviewed at the agreed cadence By scope Analyst and Monitor The above plus agreed monitoring and verification checks By scope Review add-on A founder reviews findings each month with the brand’s PM Yes ### Why focus on three modules? Most teams already have tools that record commercial signals. Track B focuses on the missing layer between those signals and a usable decision: organized context, reviewed findings and targeted monitoring. The engagement is scoped rather than requiring the entire ROQIVA platform. Specialist agents shown elsewhere illustrate the wider methodology and ROQIVA architecture. Track B is a scoped modular engagement, not access to the full agent platform. ### See how modular engagements operate 0 Qualify 1 Onboard the Brain 2 Calibrate 3 Operate 4 Expand 5 Renew or exit Phase 0 · Qualify Confirm fit and scope What we do Choose the package. List sources and owners. Explain how hosted data is handled. What you do Name owners and approvers. Sign the data terms and the inference consent. Produces Scope note and data terms Exit check Conditions to start are met Phase 1 · Onboard the Brain A confirmed context base What we do Create the tenant. Register sources. Take intake by Drop and Ask. Propose mappings. Seed the decision register. What you do Source owners confirm mappings and rules. Context owners confirm the eight sections. Produces Brain v1, coverage view, decision register v1 Exit check Owners confirm. Coverage is accepted Phase 2 · Calibrate Make the findings trustworthy What we do Run the Analyst on the Brain. A founder reviews every finding. Set the Monitor baselines. What you do Review sample findings. Give a reason for each dismissal. Produces First accepted findings, tuned bands Exit check The brand PM agrees the findings are trustworthy Phase 3 · Operate Keep signals reaching decisions What we do Refresh, run, review and alert. Maintain the Brain. What you do Decide on findings. Confirm change notices. Produces Findings inbox, exports, alerts Exit check Continuous Phase 4 · Expand Add depth What we do Add a source, a detector pack or the Monitor. Offer a Track A project for an accepted finding. What you do Approve the scope. Produces New coverage or module Exit check Per change Phase 5 · Renew or exit End cleanly What we do Export the context pack. Delete data as the terms say. Revoke credentials. Confirm deletion. What you do Decide. Collect the exports. Produces Context pack, deletion record Exit check Closed ### Understand the findings review process MESHHETU reviews outputs as defined in the engagement. A signal without adequate evidence is a gap or hypothesis, not a confirmed finding. Any alert routing is configured to the agreed scope. ### Agree a useful review cadence Agree a useful review cadence Cadence What happens Who Where configured Scoped monitoring checks and alert delivery The configured module Each agreed refresh Approved sources are reviewed and new findings are evaluated MESHHETU reviewer As scoped A consultant reviews findings before delivery MESHHETU reviewer Monthly A review call: findings, dismissals, coverage, change notices. A paid add-on A founder and the brand PM At agreed intervals Context, detector scope and operational controls are reviewed Context owners and MESHHETU ### Measure the intelligence that matters Measure the intelligence that matters Signal What it tells us Source coverage and freshness Whether findings can be trusted Findings accepted, deferred, dismissed, with reasons Whether detectors fit the brand Time from finding to decision Whether the brand uses the output Alert precision Whether alerts are worth reading Brain sections confirmed within the review window Whether context is current These signals show whether the scoped intelligence remains useful; reporting frequency is agreed with the client. ### Prepare the approved inputs - Read-only access or exports for the sources in scope. - A named brand PM and a context owner for each section. - Source owners available to confirm mappings. - Signed data terms and inference consent. - The first three decision-register cases chosen. - A destination chosen: Sheets, Slack or tickets. - A founder assigned as reviewer. ### Hold to six working rules - Findings reach the brand only after founder review, until evals hold. - Credentials are read-only. MESHHETU never changes a brand’s systems. - Every finding states its evidence label, coverage and limits. - A source that is not active is limited coverage, never healthy. - A brand’s data is never used to build another brand’s context. Platform playbooks hold no tenant data. - The Brain’s content belongs to the brand and exports on request. ### See how reliability and limits are handled What happens when plans slip If this happens Then A source goes stale A limited-coverage banner appears. Claims that need it are blocked. The owner is notified and the cursor does not advance. The brand stops reviewing findings The inbox ages, reminders go out and findings expire as deferred. It is raised in the monthly review. A burst of false findings The detector is paused with a flag, its band is reviewed and the rule is corrected. The model provider is down Runs queue and the Monitor continues. Review is delayed and the brand is told. The brand disputes a finding The evidence is shown and the fact stays conflicting until the owner sets precedence. The brand wants action in its systems Out of scope. It becomes a Track A project or moves to Track C. The brand will not accept hosted data Moves to Track C. [Discuss a modular intelligence engagement](https://meshhetu.com/contact#brief) Track C · ROQIVA · In development ## Explore ROQIVA within your existing architecture. In development Ready · In development · not production-ready ROQIVA · Revenue Operations, Quality, Intelligence & Value Architecture ROQIVA is an integrated revenue orchestration product in development, designed to work within approved client infrastructure alongside existing CRM, analytics, payment and operational tools. It is not production-ready. What you receive: The full system end to end. Track C · ROQIVA, inside your accounts In development Outside MESHHETU Designs Configures Governs The brand’s ecosystem · its cloud, data and model access CRM Payments Analytics Operations Brand tools Modules Brain Analyst Monitor Delivery layer Work items and gates Drafting agents Research · Product · Architect · Design · QA Workspace and destinations The brand owns Model access Its teams operate it Data never leaves C1 · Blueprint and governed build C2 · Packaged deployment A proposed custom implementation following an agreed blueprint and client engineering plan. Who builds: To be agreed in a future implementation scope. Ready: In development. Track C · prospective architecture and implementation 9 sections The offer Explore possible deployment approaches Understand integration and ownership How it runs See the proposed governed implementation path Examine the future packaged deployment model Know who decides what Control change to an approved slice Guardrails Meet three conditions before starting Hold to five working rules Plan for what can go wrong ### Explore possible deployment approaches Explore possible deployment approaches C1 · Blueprint and governed build C2 · Packaged deployment What it is A proposed custom implementation following an agreed blueprint and client engineering plan A planned packaged ROQIVA deployment inside approved client infrastructure Who builds To be agreed in a future implementation scope To be agreed after product readiness and security review Needs from the brand An engineering owner and architectural review Infrastructure, identity, security and integration approvals Needs from MESHHETU Design and governance A portable deployment profile and support Ready In development Planned; not production-ready These are prospective integration and deployment approaches, not production-ready options. Final scope is subject to product development and security review. ### Understand integration and ownership - Data and prompts stay in the brand’s accounts, so residency and inference consent are the brand’s own decisions. - The brand pins releases. An upgrade passes the eval gate before the brand takes it. - The brand’s team is first-line support and MESHHETU is second line. - The brand’s security review replaces the hosted data terms. ### See the proposed governed implementation path 0 Qualify 1 Design 2 Plan 3 Build 4 Pilot 5 Handover 6 Govern Phase 0 · Qualify Confirm Track C is the right shape What we do Check the Track A or B history. Identify the engineering owner. Scope the modules. What you do Name a sponsor, an engineering owner and a delivery owner. Produces Scope note Exit check Owners are named Phase 1 · Design A target system on the brand’s stack What we do Architecture, data model, detector and instrumentation specs, an integration map, build-or-buy per capability. What you do Share the stack and constraints. Run the security review. Produces Architecture pack Exit check The engineering owner signs off feasibility Phase 2 · Plan A buildable backlog What we do PRDs per slice, acceptance tests, milestones, a risk log. Slices run Brain first, then Analyst, then Monitor, then delivery. What you do Commit capacity and sprint owners. Produces PRDs, backlog, acceptance set Exit check The plan is approved Phase 3 · Build The brand’s engineers build to spec What we do Weekly planning, PRD clarifications, demo reviews, acceptance review per slice, change control. What you do Build, test and demo. Own the code. Produces Accepted slices Exit check Each slice passes its acceptance tests Phase 4 · Pilot One real case, end to end What we do Run the pilot checklist. Verify the detector cases. Review the first findings. What you do Run it on live data. Give the security sign-off. Produces Pilot report Exit check The acceptance set passes Phase 5 · Handover The brand runs it What we do Runbooks, training, the support model, a quarterly governance cadence. What you do Name operators and take ownership. Produces Runbook set Exit check The operators sign off Phase 6 · Govern Keep improving What we do A quarterly review of findings, detectors and skill upgrades through the eval gate. What you do Decide on upgrades. Produces Quarterly review Exit check Ongoing ### Examine the future packaged deployment model Planned Future deployment option; not available for production use. - 01 #### Qualify Confirm the brand’s cloud, identity, model access and security stance. A security review - 02 #### Environment The brand prepares its account, network, identity, model provider and secrets manager. The brand’s cloud team - 03 #### Profile Build the in-brand adapters for jobs, queue, storage, sandbox and model gateway. MESHHETU engineering, not yet built - 04 #### Install Deploy, configure, seed the Brain and load skills at a pinned commit. Both sides - 05 #### Accept Run the same acceptance set as C1. Both sides - 06 #### Operate The brand operates. MESHHETU is second line. Upgrades pass the eval gate and the brand pins each release. The brand’s team ### Know who decides what Know who decides what Decision Owner Scope and priorities The brand’s sponsor Architecture on the brand’s stack The brand’s engineering owner, advised by MESHHETU Requirements and acceptance tests MESHHETU as product manager Slice acceptance MESHHETU against the tests, confirmed by the engineering owner Release to production The brand’s own process Vendors and spend The brand ### Control change to an approved slice A change that alters behaviour, scope or a requirement is material: it gets an impact statement, the sponsor approves it, the PRD version moves and the slice is accepted again. A wording change does not. ### Meet three conditions before starting - A named engineering owner and a delivery owner. - Track A delivered first, so the decision register and the first findings exist. - A cloud account and a model provider account the brand controls, for C2. ### Hold to five working rules - The founders do not write production code for the brand. - The acceptance tests are the contract. A slice is done when it passes them. - No brand data leaves the brand’s accounts. - The brand pins every release. Skills and prompts change only through the eval gate. - Brain first: no later slice starts before the Brain slice is accepted. ### Plan for what can go wrong What happens when plans slip If this happens Then Engineers are unavailable The backlog is frozen and the plan re-baselined. The brand deviates from the spec Logged as a change, with its impact stated. A slice fails acceptance It returns to the brand’s engineers. It is not waived. The security review blocks Scope narrows, or the brand moves to hosted Track B. Scope grows It goes through change control. Founder capacity is full New Track C engagements wait. Existing ones are not diluted. [Explore ROQIVA, the developing product](https://meshhetu.com/roqiva) Which engagement fits? ## Start with the outcome, not the technology. You do not need to choose a system before we understand the problem. Find the MESHHETU engagement that fits your situation If you need Start here Availability Help diagnosing a commercial problem, shaping strategy or governing delivery Track A · Strategic Consulting Available now Targeted context, recurring diagnostics or monitoring without major integration Track B · Modular Systems Intelligence Available now A complete orchestration platform integrated within your technology architecture Track C · ROQIVA product discussion In development ## Choose a practical next step. Book a discussion about consulting or modular intelligence available now, or talk to us about ROQIVA’s development. [Book a working session](https://meshhetu.com/contact#book) [Send a brief](https://meshhetu.com/contact#brief)